Striking While the Iron’s Hot: The Trans-Atlantic ‘Adventures’ of Charles (Moses) Porter-Phelps

Phelps Farm, built in 1815, served as Charles (Moses) Porter-Phelps' (1772- 1857) escape from the hustle and bustle of Boston. He, the first son of Elizabeth and Charles Phelps, spent his youth in Hadley at Forty-Acres, before attending Harvard University as a young man. After graduation, he moved to Boston where he would try his hand at law, meet his to-be wife Sarah, and delve into a series of business deals that would largely work out in his favor. The wealth he amassed during his time in Boston paid for the construction of Phelps farm in the later years of his life. The large homestead, built right across from the Porter-Phelps-Huntington Museum, would serve as a home for several generations of the Phelps family, forever tying future family members with the sort-of work Phelps conducted.

Phelps’ first career in law ended when he closed his office in Boston in the summer of 1799, citing that the expenses to live in Boston far outweighed his salary, returning to Hadley to live with his family; during this summer he helped oversee some alterations to the home.(1) In 1800, he married his first wife Sarah Davenport, and decided to live in Boston once again. In the city, he would shift his career for the first of many times over his life. A business partnership with Edward Rand anchored his growing family in the city where Phelps experimented with merchant business from a wholesale on the No. 3 Cadman’s Wharf. Unfortunately, this would be a short-lived endeavor— in that same year, Rand died in a duel, permanently ending the arrangement. Soon after, Phelps strikes up a connection with William Belcher, a tradesman out of Savannah, Georgia, and for several years, the family’s income came from the ‘runs’ he and his partner did between ports in Boston and Georgia. Together, the men made their fortune in commodities cultivated by enslaved African Americans in the American South— goods like cotton, rice, and tobacco— selling such products to Northern American and European markets. During this time, Phelps occupied a store on the India Wharf in Boston, the city's headquarters of trade with international and domestic markets. Though a short-lived and tenuous peace had been met on the European continent, putting a brief pause on the Napoleonic Wars which ravaged the continent,  Phelps and Belcher mutually dissolved their partnership— at least that is what Phelps attests to in his diary.(2) Although a number of factors likely contributed to this decision, it is possible that highly protective trade acts like the Embargo Act of 1807, which fully banned all American exportation to the European continent, contributed to the mutual end of affairs. (3) 

Still, Phelps decided to send the rest of his stock of Havana Sugar, nearly $200,000 of goods in today’s currency (2024), to Rotterdam on the off-chance he may turn some profit in European markets in the summer of 1807.  He’s only notified of the whereabouts of his shipment after he travels back to Hadley to be with his dying father— Charles Phelps Jr.. Phelps writes that by a ‘miracle of God,’ his shipment did in fact reach Rotterdam.(4) His business partner in Rotterdam, Mr. Cremer chose to hold on to the goods until the price inflated, and as a result, Phelps’ shipment sold for over $26,000—a little over half a million USD when adjusted for inflation— after deducting the price of freight. Cremers' decision to hold onto the goods further explains why Phelps cited confusion on the shipment's whereabouts and his surprise when he learned that the ship made it to the continent. He notes in his autobiography that this is a godsend to his business, and with some embargoes lifted by 1809, he returns to Boston with his family and begins to dip his hand into international trade once again. With this large sum of money, the family continued to live as an incredibly wealthy family, skirting the financial crisis many families went through. Most overseas businesses ceased in 1812 and goods produced within the United States became increasingly more expensive; while many families struggled during this time to afford necessities, the Phelps had a mass of wealth that would sustain them for several years, regardless of Phelps’ labor status. 

         In the spring of 1812, America entered what Phelps calls a ‘useless’ war with Great Britain, the War of 1812, (5) during which all Trans-Atlantic commerce was suspended. (6) A letter sent to Phelps in 1812 discusses the complex geopolitical conflicts that drastically impacted trade. The writer warns Phelps of the various treaties that would alter the viability of trade with nations like Russia, France, and Britain.(7) According to Phelps, any trade that was occurring during this time had an air of militarism, as ships were under constant threat from the British Navy. Over the next few years, businesses like the Phelps’ would be pushed to seek out new markets internationally as the regular channels of commerce closed. His business would become chiefly connected to webs of trade in northern Europe, though specifically to the iron business in Gothenburg, Sweden.

One side of a draft letter to Charles (Moses) Porter Phelps which outlines various political conflicts in Europe that hindered the viability of trans-Atlantic trade, written from Hamburg on March 3, 1812. The writer (unintelligible) describes the benefits and drawbacks of trade with Sweden, particularly that though Sweden is still open to trading, the trade market is limited. By the end of the letter, the writer hopes that the ‘embarrassment to Commerce” will cease by the Summer— that market conditions will improve.

“My own business was now chiefly connected with the trade of northern Sweden, some of my shipment of that kind having been quite successful— and during the two coming years my business was almost wholly in that line. Indeed, during the war I kept quite a respectable wholesale and retail Iron Store on the Long Wharf.” [Phelps, 48]

Above is a deed of shipment, signed by Nicholas Myers, outlining a shipment of goods from Gothenburg Sweden, on May 9, 1812, to Charles (Moses) Porter Phelps in Boston. According to the deed, 2,284 bars of Swedish Iron and 102 bundles of Swedish Iron (weighing 40 tons) were shipped by John Cunnigham upon a ship called the Indian Chief to Phelps in Boston. The deed requests that Phelps pay $560 and 6 cents as a delivery fee, about 13,242.59 in today’s currency (2024).

 A receipt of shipment dated May 8th, 1812 attests to this transition in trade, as some 2,285 bars of Swedish iron were transported from Gothenburg to Boston and delivered to Phelps.(8) A wholesale that he’d purchased on the Long Wharf in Boston was the headquarters of his business— a business, which, like the many other iron traders, took advantage of the market for iron available in accessible ports in Sweden. Such trade would become instrumental in the progression of industrialization into and through the mid-1800s. 

By 1815, the U.S. was quickly returning to its once peaceful relationship with the European countries, as the Treaty of Ghent was agreed upon and signed in December 1814, officially closing the conflict on all fronts. The shift in geo-political relations once again resulted in a shift in economic relations, straining the viability of the Swedish iron trade with America. International trade was returning to a state of normalcy as blockades fell and markets were reopened. In Boston specifically, the prices of imported goods began to fall.(9) As a result, Phelps chooses again to shift his career, leaving the mercantile business for good and entering banking, moving into a position as a cashier for the Bank of Massachusetts.(10) 

 “At this period the commerce of Europe and America was fast resuming its usual peaceful relations. Men bred to this business and well established in it, might indulge reasonable hopes of success— but the untrained- desultory shipper must now expect as a matter of course to pocket more losses than gains— and the truth of this was fully verified in the business in which I allowed myself to engage, small as it was, for the two succeeding years, such being the aspect of things, I was induced to the close of the year to accept the office of Cashier of the Massachusetts Bank…” [Phelps, 61]

Banking at any level was a privilege of the time, something reserved for only the upper echelons of society, and was a career well suited to his class and status. He remained in Boston for a few more years before moving back to Hadley and building Phelps Farm. 

The choices Phelps made during this unsteady time in American history allowed his family to escape the financial burdens that befell the general population of early Americans. From trading in Southern American goods to trading Swedish iron, he relied on his business to consistently sustain his family’s high-class lifestyle during some of the most tumultuous financial times of the early 19th century, building a generational fortune for the Phelps family and a large farmhouse to go with it. Still, his initial ‘runs’ of cotton, tobacco, and sugar up the eastern seaboard would implicate the family’s wealth in the continued enslavement of African Americans in the southern portions of the United States and the Caribbean— prolonging systems of enslavement throughout the country even after slavery ends in Massachusetts.(11) And, his later decision to import iron to the United States made him one of many merchants of iron who played an essential role in furthering the industrialization of the U.S. through the early 1800s— a process that would have harrowing implications for labor relations and the health of the climate into the early 20th century and today. Therefore the decisions Charles (Moses) Porter Phelps made during his life chiefly connected the family to a web of commerce which, while sustaining his family’s status, would be influential in determining the lives of generations of Americans to come. 

End Notes

(1) Phelps, 20

(2) Phelps, 32-33 

(3) The Embargo Act of 1807 came as a response to French and English naval policies which dictated that all vessels found trading with England and France respectively were to be seized. 

(4) Phelps, 37

(5) The American War of 1812 being an expansion of the ongoing Napoleonic Wars (1793-1819) in mainland Europe. Trade warfare resulted from this expansive war, with trade blockages often halting imports/ exports out of entire countries for extended periods. Piracy was commonplace and ships, and the cargo they held, were frequently confiscated.

(6) Phelps, 47 

(7) The signature on the letter is unintelligible

(8) Shipping Receipt, Porter-Phelps-Huntington Family Papers (MS 1148). Special Collections and University Archives, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.

(9) Adamson, 71

(10) Phelps, 61

(11) Slavery legally ends in Massachusetts between 1782-1783.

Sources

Adamson, Rolf. “Swedish Iron Exports to the United States, 1783–1860.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 17, no. 1 (January 1969): 58–114 

Phelps, Charles (Moses) Porter. Autobiography (1857) Porter-Phelps-Huntington Family Papers Box 10 Folder 21 Amherst College Archives and Special Collections

Shipping Receipt, Porter-Phelps-Huntington Family Papers (MS 1148). Special Collections and University Archives, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.

Letter Addressed to Charles (Moses) Porter Phelps, Porter-Phelps-Huntington Family Papers (MS 1148). Special Collections and University Archives, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries.

Shays' Rebellion and Forty Acres

BenjaminLincoln.jpg

As this house was one of the more prominent estates in western Massachusetts from before the birth of this country until almost the 20th century, one would imagine it had some influence or connection to the significant historical events in the region, including revolts and revolutions. Shays’ Rebellion, which is considered the most significant military intervention in western Massachusetts, had multiple connections to Forty Acres, including two men with two very different perspectives on the altercation. 

America's massive war debt, accumulated during the Revolution, proved an important factor leading to Shays’ Rebellion. The cost of financing the war, including monetary incentives for soldiers who fought in the revolution and loans from the federal treasury, left Massachusetts with a staggering amount of debt--  $41,500,000 to be exact (with a current day worth of over one billion dollars) .  To make matters worse, a trade embargo imposed by Great Britain barred the newly formed nation from the important British West Indies trade route. Consequently, merchants could not form vital trade partnerships that were necessary to finance a new country. This exacerbated the ongoing recession, while state and federal debts likewise resisted mitigation.

As a result, the federal government raised the taxes to a crippling level-- the tax rate ballooned by over 1000% between 1774 and 1786 . To combat this, most states printed and issued more paper money to get the economy flowing again and allow farmers to pay off their debts, or excuse them all together. Massachusetts, however, decided to follow through with these taxes , and furthermore wanted all debts to be repaid in the same currency as they were borrowed-- strictly gold and silver . Prior to the war, the economy of western Massachusetts depended on an extensive bartering system, and thus many people lacked universal material currency. When taxes grew astronomically following the Revolution, the populations in western Massachusetts who had relied on a bartering economy found themselves with little gold or silver to pay them . 

In Western Massachusetts, the courts were flooded with foreclosures from farmers, many of whom fought in the war, and immediately people gathered to storm the courts. Their goal was to stop or hinder these court proceedings by intimidating the judges. Daniel Shays, a farmer from Pelham, Massachusetts and former soldier in the American Revolution, emerged as the leader of this revolution . Along with Shays and local militias, many community supporters  also gathered at these courts, including former owner and operator of Forty Acres, Charles Phelps. However, he was in support of  the courts and militia as opposed to Shays. Elizabeth Porter Phelps noted multiple times in her diary how her husband “set out for Springfield” to “uphold the court” in both 1782 and in 1786 . Charles' presence would be expected at these rebellions as he was very tightly connected with the local government; he had been reelected twenty times as a local selectman and also served as the deputy to the General Court in Boston in 1780. Charles’ frequent trips to Boston to trade cattle equipped him well with gold, silver, and paper money. This set him apart from his neighbors as his government ties and financial security allowed him not to feel the effects of these taxes and recession as much as others .

Charles Phelps was also present in 1786 at a very significant court closing in Springfield- the last one until the final meeting of the two sides in January. This is unsurprising given the large audience this exchange, which affected almost everyone in the area, attracted. Either they supported the rebellion, or, like Phelps, supported the government. On this day, September 26, 1786, Daniel Shays reportedly led a large group of nearly 600 to the Springfield courthouse where they attempted to interrupt another court hearing, something they had done succesfully in five other Massachusetts towns that summer. Aiming to protest peacefully, Daniel Shays attempted to make a deal with General William Shepard to allow the protestors into the courthouse and to have many foreclosures thrown out; however, Shays’ requests were far outside of Shepard’s control, and no deal was made. However, the two men agreed to let the “Shaysites” protest outside the courthouse, if they agreed not to attack the militia or the judges residing inside . This bittersweet end failed to satisfy either side, and soon enough they would meet again in a bloody exchange.

The protest at the Springfield courthouse on September 27th, 1786

The protest at the Springfield courthouse on September 27th, 1786

By late January 1787, the Massachusetts government sensed that an attack on the arsenal in Springfield by Shays' forces was imminent. To combat this, Governor James Bowdoin asked General Benjamin Lincoln to aid General Shepard and the militia in Springfield, where he would arrive on January 20th. Lincoln was a recently retired revolutionary war hero who was handicapped in battle with a gunshot to the knee, but still led many armies into battle and was even present with George Washington when Cornwallis officially surrendered to America. After the war, he served as the first Secretary of War under the Articles of Confederation; however, he retired soon after and resided in Hingham . Benjamin Lincoln also brings the second link between Shays’ Rebellion and Forty Acres: his great granddaughter, Hannah Dane Sargent, would marry Frederic Dan Huntington . Even though Phelps and Lincoln were strangers then and never met each other, they each supported the same cause. This presents a fascinating  example of how the connections of Forty Acres stretch incredibly far.

General Benjamin Lincoln

General Benjamin Lincoln

Generals Lincoln and Shepard were well prepared on the day of January 25, 1787 as they had been guarding the Springfield arsenal for days in anticipation of the Shaysites’ attack. Again, Charles Phelps assisted their forces,  predominantly by providing  supplies and food on multiple occasions. Elizabeth recounts in her diary how on January 14th, he brought the meat of two slaughtered oxen to the militia men at Springfield . Despite superior numbers, Shays' forces of over 1400 were easily defeated by the 1200 men guarding the arsenal. As the militia were posted up in front of the building and waiting for the advancement, it allowed them to easily fire upon the approaching forces. Additionally, as this was in mid January in Massachusetts, Shays and his men faced nearly four feet of snow as they attempted to “storm” the arsenal. A cannon was fired, followed by muskets from many of the militia, which as a result scattered Shays and his army . In the following days, Lincoln and the militia continued to push Shays and rebel forces back until January 30th, where Lincoln and the militia had moved northward to Hadley. Here, he attempted one last time to convince Shays to stand down, and yet again Shays refused and pulled his men back to their headquarters in Petersham. Just days later on February 3rd and 4th, Lincoln and the militia struck at the headquarters, dissolving Shays’ revolutionary forces once and for all .

The scene of January 25th, 1787 at the Springfield arsenal

The scene of January 25th, 1787 at the Springfield arsenal

Even though this rebellion was defeated quite anticlimactically, it still left an incredibly lasting effect on the United States as a whole. Shays’ Rebellion successfully got the attention of the federal government and pushed them to centralize legislative power in hopes to prevent similar rebellions through restricting such excessive taxes, offering more support to local militias and easing the rules set upon the state governments that limited their power to shut down these uprisings. Subsequently, this pushed the US to move past the Articles of Confederation which lacked the ability to have a strong central government, and move onto the Constitution which strengthened the federal powers and allowed states more power over their citizens. Additionally, the state government of Massachusetts also lessened  taxes and forgave many people's debts. Even though Charles Phelps and Benjamin Lincoln were fighting for the opposite side of these results, they most likely would still be in favor of how things turned out. As Benjamin Lincoln was a prominent member of the revolutionary army and Charles Phelps was linked to the revolution in many ways, they were both sympathetic towards the movement led by Daniel Shays. Benjamin Lincoln was a fan of liberty, and he was most certainly not against men like Daniel Shays who were fighting in its name, just as he had less than ten years prior. He too agreed with always questioning authority, and if these taxes were to affect him, there's a good chance he too would have participated in the Rebellion. However, Lincoln was a well-paid retired war general living in Hingham, Massachusetts, where the bartering system was not as universal; he had sufficient gold and silver to pay off the problematic taxes. Yet again, Forty Acres and those who passed through it serve as a wonderful perspective for American history, in this instance giving two views of one of the most prominent military encounters in Massachusetts’ history.


Work Cited

“Benjamin Lincoln Papers.” Massachusetts Historical Society. Accessed August 9, 2021. https://www.masshist.org/collection-guides/view/fa0254. 

Shays' Rebellion - Historic Scenes. Springfield Technical Community College. Accessed August 9, 2021. http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/scenes/home.do. 

Carlisle, Elizabeth Pendergast. Earthbound and Heavenbent: Elizabeth Porter Phelps and Life at Forty Acres (1747-1817). New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004. 

Ladenberg, Thomas. “Paper Money and Shays’ Rebellion.”Chapter in Critical Issues and Simulations Units in American History. Accessed August 9, 2021. http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/lesson_plan_ladenburg.cfm. 

Weir, Robert E., ed.Benjamin Lincoln at 40 Acres: An Exhibit to Commemorate the Bicentennial of the Shays Rebellion.